SLI home
User login

A BLOG FOR E-COMMERCE LEADERS

  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Webinars
  • Customer Experience Scorecard

SLI Blog

Google's Related Results

Posted by Shaun RyanApril 17, 2006Press3 comments
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Share on Reddit
Reddit
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print

Google recently confirmed that they have made a change to their interface. For certain keywords they will show 3 related results inserted into the main results. For example, here’s what you see when you search for tokenize.

There have been reports of this for quite some time, so Google have obviously done a reasonable amount of testing with this before they decided to roll it out to everyone. However, I don’t like it. I find them intrusive and the times I have seen them appear I was frustrated – I wanted to see results for the term I typed in – not for what Google thought I wanted to see.

I think something like this can significantly enhance the user experience but it needs to be less intrusive. Most other search engines chose to show related searches but few of them have got it exactly right. I like Yahoo’s interface where they show related searches below the search box.

yahoo insulin.JPG

This is nice and simple – but suffers from the problem that all the related search terms contain the word insulin, graphically demonstrated if you see all the related searches, e.g for insulin:

yahoo insulin all.JPG

Ask have almost got it right – but chose to complicate their interface by grouping the related searches that expand or narrow your search or are related names. This is cool from a geeks perspective but I don’t think people care whether they’re expanding or narrowing their search. If a related search term that expands your search is more useful then it should be shown at the top of the list.

ask insulin.jpg

AOL used to use a similar concept – of clustering – from Vivisimo but when I looked just now I didn’t see it. They did show some related terms – but it searched only AOL results. MSN doesn’t offer anything like this.

There are some, enlightened smaller search engines who have got it right IMHO. For example search.com and mamma.com show related terms on the right hand side of the results. You just click them to fire off another search It’s simple, non-intrusive and really useful.

search insulin.JPG

Of course, I am biased because we provide the related searches for those enlightened search engines :-). But I am truthfully less than impressed with Google’s effort.

Shaun Ryan
Next post It's conference season

3 comments. Leave new

Andrew
April 26, 2006 5:29 pm

I like google’s new functionality.

I find that there are times when I’m searching for something and the correct related search comes up in the 3rd to 6th spot as mentioned, but interestingly I often only click the 3rd spot as this is what I was looking for.

If there was a link which said: related search, I would need to click it and then click that result – therefore the way it is done now is saving me time.

Paul Denhup
May 5, 2006 1:11 am

Maybe you should try searching for “insulin” on Google instead of “tokenize?”

😉

Mariam Ispahani
May 9, 2006 9:23 am

Interesting write-up… I prefer Google over Yahoo and the others, seems easier to me, BUT… I am still waiting for a better filteration system.

-mariam-

Stay up to date with SLI

Featured Posts

  • Maximize Revenue with Enhanced Product Impact Testing
  • Top Five Ways to Prepare for Peak Season
  • Facets, Facets, Who’s Got the Facets?
  • Personalization: It’s Kind of a Big Deal
  • M is the New E: Mobile Commerce Trends and Predictions

Categories

About SLI Systems

  • What We Do
  • Who We Are
  • Why SLI

Learn

  • Webinars
  • News Room
  • Events

Connect

© Copyright SLI Systems, 2018. All Rights Reserved | US: (866) 240-2812 | Legal